News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > N1 C702 & C510 camdrivers Bookmark topic

Actually to be honest, yesterday I tested shooting the same scene (a well lit room, exposed to sunlight) with both my phones and C702 came out with a better pic. Surprising!
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 03:35:39
Edit : Quote


@gtr
What did you mean? C702 vs C905??
My camdriver have been already to test. Check se-indo.net at member project forum.

@all
It will be announce here soon in this week for testing purpose.

@pakhusin
Buffer size and compression taken from N1 camdriver, and add constant saturation and WB color correction hope could produce real and rich color and minimize yellowish picture.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 04:43:42
Edit : Quote


@code
i've tried ur camdriver, to be honest,
the picture seems out of focus.

maybe on phone review looks okay, but not screen monitor.

--
Posted: 2009-04-08 07:10:49
Edit : Quote


please post your comment on my topic please.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 07:24:49
Edit : Quote


Yup C905 VS C702. C905 runs the standard 2.7 driver while C702 is on N1 3.3 beta.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 08:05:40
Edit : Quote


Where can download N1 3.3 beta??
I want to test.
It will be fuzzy that C702 shoots the middle distance photo
I want to 3.3 can changes this!!
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 12:01:35
Edit : Quote


In this thread, but a few pages back. Also if the link doesn't work anymore, I can send you via email.
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 13:22:50
Edit : Quote


Thank you!!
I already find that^^
--
Posted: 2009-04-08 14:08:04
Edit : Quote


code28h4p: I thought it generally...of course, it's problem to get lower noise with faster shutter speed...that't is what I said a I don't see reason, why it should not be true.
Yes, c702 has problem with bad aperture...at k750 it works perfectly. here, it can make little better pics, but it's still bad. Question is, what is problem to solve... we don't get pics like from k800, or even k750...but we can try to improve.
Throught day, c702 (as well as c510) need longer exp. times than k800 to get picture with the (quite) same light and ISO, thx. hardware. (and when you are indoor, differences can be huge...so somtimes, there is no chage to take pics. from hand) So, we can't do much in this.
At night, sometimes, I would like to have scene longer times with ISO about 400 bu rather 800. I have reasons for it..

Anyway..he wanted faster shutter speed and lower noise....when you use faster shutter speed, you get darker picture...and if you need the same looking pict, you have to use higher ISO - and get more noise. I'm sure, that now it's clear, what I thought.

--
Posted: 2009-04-08 14:27:19
Edit : Quote


which cam driver is better

ive got C510 but its slighly yellowish

any idea
--
Posted: 2009-04-13 16:15:39
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index