>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
After looking at several reviews about this nokia flagship camera phone I learned two things:
with Pureview ON
808's image quality is awesome, lowlight probably surpasses 1/1.7" cameras at anything below ISO800
with Full Resolution
808's image quality is decent with lots of details at well illuminated objects, but for anything concerning low-light, it's laughable
besides I wouldn't call the Blind Test a Blind Test, since it's pretty much obvious which one is which. and it's very easy for Nokia fans at GSMArena to detect which ones were taken by 808 and N8 since they use the same image processing, same thing goes for SGSIII and iPhone 4s since they use the same sensor so the DNA in their sample pictures is unlikely different. HTC is infamous for their poor post processing so I'll find it ridiculous if people would fail to guess which one comes from it. and there's the M43 Olympus samples which I'm pretty sure are never difficult to guess.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-06-18 07:52 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 08:40:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-06-18 07:00:40, Guarulhos wrote:
These Two Factors Therefore Added To
Poor Performance In Sales Xperia S Placed The Dispute Outside This !
P.S: Justice Be Done... Since July 2009 (Release From Excellent CyberShot C901) None Sony Ericsson / Sony Draws Attention When The Subject Is Photo And Video !
Several Are Released From There To Here With Poor Photo Quality !!!
I beg to disagree. To some extent, if sales would be the basis, the Xperia S deserves to be on the shoot-out instead of the HTC one X.
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 08:51:17
Edit :
Quote
I Agree With You... Sony Xperia S Is a Fine Smartphone !
But His Photo Quality Is Well Below The Models Of Nokia, Samsung, HTC And Apple !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 09:11:25
Edit :
Quote
Rasec...
The 808 PureView Is Superior To Any Digital Camera Compact Size Sensor Independent Integrated With These Cameras !
Canon PowerShot G12 (1/1.7") Cano Powershot S100 (1/1.7"), Ricoh GR Digital IV (1/1.7"), Nikon Coolpix P7100 (1/1.7"), Panasonic DMC-LX5 (1/1.63"), Olympus XZ-1(1/1.63"), Fujifilm FinePix X-10 (2/3") And Sony RX100 (1") Regardless Of Which One, All Are No Exception Bottom Of The King Cameraphones !
P.S: Only CANON G1X... You Can Think To Compete With
The Almighty By Nokia !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 09:20:11
Edit :
Quote
I enjoyed your trolling my friend
RX100 has larger pixels (read: better sensitivity) and larger sensor size than the 808 PureView just in case you don't understand how large the sensor of that Sony camera have. and besides we can pit 808 in Pureview Mode to an RX100 20MP sample downscaled to 8mp and find the latter still winning. RX100 had larger aperture, larger sensor which results to better DoF (better
Bokeh), better ISO sensitivity at full resolution) and proper zoom lens and image sensor.
okay let me give you some enlightenment
BTW Nikon's CX sensor and the 1" Exmor sensor from Sony are the same type, it's Sony who produced the sensor afterall
EDIT: I forgot to add this, but the section where you posted this as well as the 808 vs DSLR thread clearly indicates that you are trolling Samsung and Sony users.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-06-18 08:54 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2017-01-01 19:34 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 09:37:06
Edit :
Quote
Staying Rather Than Crying Like You!
Prefer Me Stick To Reality That 808 PureView Proven As Evidence Test Above Surpassed
2 DSLR Cameras Sony Alpha And One Olympus Micro Four Thirds ! And That's Proven Fact !!!
Not Mere Speculation And How His Lectures !
Nokia's Expertise In The Picture + Toshiba Absolute Efficiency In Your Quality Of Image Sensors, 808 Shows That Is The King Of Time And The Image Will Show This In Practice Even Against Sony RX100 !
P.S: Really Cry... Because You Have To Argue Against Picture Quality From 808 PureView Against Cameras DSLR's For When The Mobile Phones Are Subject, He Is Light Years !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 10:02:50
Edit :
Quote
Sorry mate, there's hardly anything to cry for, what I know was that I shouldn't stain esato forum section with baseless hate post and trolls that's why I'm posting my opinions and objections with objectivity in mind. now since you failed to answer my questions with objectiveness, I think this should be my final post in this thread concerning you
Oh well let's wait for GSMArena's PureView 808 review which I believe will come soon to prove my and your point, shall we?
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 10:14:05
Edit :
Quote
lol I had fun reading this thread
Guarulhos really trying to persuade or convince us 808 is better than a DSLR.
@Guarulhos
The reason why photographers buy a DSLR is not because of picture quality alone. It's what you can do with a DSLR (greater depth of field, manual focus, exposure bracketing, raw format, dedicated camera controls, the ability to choose which type of flash attachment to use for a specific shot, etc. the list goes on).
808 is still a point and shoot camera, and it can never go beyond that.
we never said anything against your precious 808, but why are you so insecure?
you should be confident instead if it's really that great
As a point and shoot camera 808 is good, but as a smartphone I'd say it's average.
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 13:05:44
Edit :
Quote
well said kabayan!
now can this thread be moved to its proper section? @admins?
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 13:28:28
Edit :
Quote
A topic talking about a blind test by a blind fanboy of Nokia on Samsung forum...
How funny things can be
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 16:11:02
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
