>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> Sony Xperia rumours 2021
Bookmark topic
On 2020-11-14 07:37:32, XperiaJunkie wrote:
On 2020-11-13 15:24:05, Hawk12 wrote:
XJ was here last week.
📸🤯🤫
I think this means mind blowing rear camera. So I expect at least one significant upgrade in the camera setup. There were also talks about periscope zooms.
Isn't this Alvin, Alvin Zahran from here? He had the unsolvable hint about 1ii.
Honestly I don't think Sony would lose anything if they opted for this sd875 if it exists. But if they keep the cameras same and no micro front camera with less bezels. It'll be a boring upgrade.
Uwa modules are easier to keep thin with larger sensors. Also you don't get as much cam shake as longer focal lengths.
--
Posted: 2021-01-16 17:21:21
Edit :
Quote
The lack of sponsored posts already results in bad reviews from few websites (read what Android Police have on it).
Imagine not using best cpu.
Nobody is going to charge $1200 or more for phone with cpu second level (on pair with exynos 1080).
How many times did you guys see posts on weibo/twitter saying 5ii was gonna use 865+?
Same story.
[ This Message was edited by: Hawk12 on 2021-01-16 18:02 ]
--
Posted: 2021-01-16 19:01:36
Edit :
Quote
On 2021-01-16 15:26:22, Hawk12 wrote:
Why does the UWA have better video stabilization? Because it is the one without OIS.
If my phone had UWA, I would not use.
24-25mm is already too wide for me.
Having the 363 as 72-110mm real zoom periscope would be way much better than using it as ultra wide.
The wider the lens the less camera shake affects things, you don't need OIS on an ultra wide. It doesn't mean it's got better stabilisation, it's just easier to work with.
--
Posted: 2021-01-16 19:56:27
Edit :
Quote
No matter the FL.
If the 24mm and 70mm did not have OIS as well, video stabilization would be better too.
Apple was clever to ditch OIS on 12 pro max in favor of IBIS.
--
Posted: 2021-01-16 20:03:10
Edit :
Quote
If Sony can do those specs and up the camera and match S21U in some ways, it'll have higher res screen, mSD, 256gb (S21U base is 128), headphone jack,
4K@120Hz. It's not like 875 will be midrange. It's a proper flagship soc from what's leaked. Sony already invested in some photography channel reviews and I believe it was AA who made a dedicated camera review and praised it, even SuperSaf was mild about 1ii. I don't think a bit more Ghz in an X1 core would make a big difference.
It's not OIS's fault that it's a bad implementation, IBIS is also a mechanical solution. What's holding Sony back from using both? And at 12mp 4K recoring with only EIS would probably be horrible. Not many extra pixels.
--
Posted: 2021-01-16 21:03:00
Edit :
Quote
Professional videocameras use only EIS. Usually they are 10 or 12MP. (Tv channels rarely use more than 1080p).
Most photo cameras lenses do not have OIS.
OIS adds 0.5 stops, IBIS at least 5.0 of stabilization.
Having IBIS, also would allow pixel shift (if space enough).
--
Posted: 2021-01-16 23:09:44
Edit :
Quote
Xperias went from the best video stabilization among flagships to worst when it transitioned from EIS only to OIS+EIS. With photography taking priority over video starting with Xperia 1 OIS was necessary and I get that but obviously something is really wrong since we are now four devices away from the initial one with OIS+EIS combo and improvements have been so incremental. Xperia 1 has a lot more tear and shake but a lot more detail compared to Xperia 1II which has occasional tears but it lost texture details when shooting in Camera app.
--
Posted: 2021-01-17 00:02:22
Edit :
Quote
1ii has more crop than 1. FOV is narrower.
More pixels are cut off.
Reason texture is worse.
But ppl that know how to use Cinema Pro and properly deal with HLG edition say footage is stunning. Too good to believe it was from a phone.
--
Posted: 2021-01-17 01:40:39
Edit :
Quote
Please let it be better performance than 865+ yet consume less battery and temperature overheating unlike snapdragon888.
--
Posted: 2021-01-17 02:19:42
Edit :
Quote
AlvinZahranM Posts: > 500
yes, that was me.
but I deleted that post out of severe suspicions I've had with those words. Many of the info I received was also really suspicious. I shouldn't have said that in the first place (should've confirmed them with other sources too).
--
Posted: 2021-01-17 03:04:05
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
