>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> 30 fps video: the SE way
Bookmark topic
On 2007-11-15 15:18:18, crossmatched wrote:
On 2007-11-14 19:08:19, QVGA wrote:
since when is QVGA video TV quality? Are you planning on watching it on a 10 inch TV?
its not the 320x240 resolution that makes sakura and sophia's video TV quality. it is the frame rate per seconds that their video can manage to record. 30 fps is standard TV quality.
_________________
its not all about the money... the best things in life are free!
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2007-11-15 14:20 ]
its not tv quality, whichever you put it. I cant even imagine watching a 320x240 res video on TV.
--
Posted: 2007-11-16 11:54:46
Edit :
Quote
TV quality would be 25 fps by PAL standard or 23.976/29.97 fps by NTSC standard.
Since 30 fps is higher than any standard's fps a pulldown is required which is much easier than speed-up.
--
Posted: 2007-11-16 14:19:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-11-15 17:36:08, crossmatched wrote:
DVD resolution is 720 or 704 or 640 x 480/60 in NTSC and 768 or 720 x 576/50 for PAL or SECAM resolution.
I have no clue where you are getting your data, however consider the following true data on Wikipedia ....
On 2007-11-16 9:25:00, Wikipedia DVD Article wrote:
DVD-Video is a standard for storing video content on DVD media. In the U.S., weekly DVD-Video rentals first out-numbered weekly VHS cassette rentals in June 2003, illustrating the rapid adoption rate of the technology in the marketplace.[8]
Though many resolutions and formats are supported, most consumer DVD-Video discs use either 4:3 or anamorphic 16:9 aspect ratio MPEG-2 video, stored at a resolution of 720×480 (NTSC) or 720×576 (PAL) at 24, 30, or 60 FPS. Audio is commonly stored using the Dolby Digital (AC-3) or Digital Theater System (DTS) formats, ranging from 16-bits/48kHz to 24-bits/96kHz format with monaural to 7.1 channel "Surround Sound" presentation, and/or MPEG-1 Layer 2. Although the specifications for video and audio requirements vary by global region and television system, many DVD players support all possible formats. DVD-Video also supports features like menus, selectable subtitles, multiple camera angles, and multiple audio tracks.
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD
Also ...
On 2007-11-16 9:25:00, Wikipedia DVD-Video wrote:
Resolution
The typical video resolution for an NTSC disc is 720 × 480, while a PAL disc is 720 × 576 (all measured in pixels). For comparison, VHS is roughly equivalent to 320 × 480 (NTSC) or 320 × 576 (PAL/SECAM), while Laserdisc and Super VHS are roughly equivalent to 566 × 480 (NTSC) or 566 × 576 (PAL) edge-to-edge. The specifications for video files on a DVD can be any of the following:
* Up to 9.8 Mbit/s (9800 kbit/s) MPEG-2 video
* Up to 1.856 Mbit/s (1856 kbit/s) MPEG-1 video
* PAL:
720 × 576 pixels MPEG-2 (Called full D1)
704 × 576 pixels MPEG-2
352 × 576 pixels MPEG-2 (Called Half-D1, same as the China Video Disc standard)
352 × 288 pixels MPEG-2
352 × 288 pixels MPEG-1 (Same as the VCD Standard)
* NTSC:
720 × 480 pixels MPEG-2 (Called full D1)
704 × 480 pixels MPEG-2
352 × 480 pixels MPEG-2 (Called Half-D1, same as the China Video Disc standard)
352 × 240 pixels MPEG-2
352 × 240 pixels MPEG-1 (Same as the VCD Standard)
[edit] Frame rate and other requirements
--
Posted: 2007-11-16 15:27:25
Edit :
Quote
Just putting my 2cents worth, i had a W900 and the video recording was NICE it wasn't the greatest but it was better than the average phone video camera but HONESTLY NOT something i would call "TV QUALITY" it records in 3GP QVGA 30FPS i mean come on now! If you want to talk about good quality then maybe the K850 QVGA 30FPS MPEG-4 is good. But the best has to be the Nokia N93,N93i, N95,N95-8GB, N82 which do it in VGA 30FPS MPEG-4 and probably the LG VIEWTY which does it in a mind blowing VGA 120FPS MPEG-4 now those phones are "TV QUALITY".
and why are you calling the SEs by their codenames?
_________________
So If The Devil Wears Prada Adam And Eve Wear nada im In Between but Way More Fresher With Way Less Effort cause When You Try Hard You Die Hard
http://www.myspace.com/gucci_011[ This Message was edited by: GUCCI.011 on 2007-11-16 15:39 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-16 16:36:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-11-16 16:36:19, GUCCI.011 wrote:
...probably the LG VIEWTY which does it in a mind blowing VGA 120FPS MPEG-4 now those phones are "TV QUALITY".
120 FPS for QVGA and 30 FPS for VGA
--
Posted: 2007-11-16 16:51:04
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
thecell,
audio codec of sophia's video is AAC
QVGA,
320x240 resolution is indeed NOT TV quality. But the 30 frames per second (FPS) video of sakura and sophia IS TV quality. That is my point.
prom1,
check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video#Video_resolution
--
Posted: 2007-11-16 17:26:47
Edit :
Quote
@(K850 owners)
does the framerate dropping in video recordings has been fixed with the new firmware or not???? (recording more than 2-3 mins)
thanks.
(as you may know K850 drops the fps after some seconds of recording)
--
Posted: 2007-11-17 08:03:17
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
how come k850 does frame droppping? w900 which is 2 years senior of k850 doesn't drop frames. isn't k850 supposed to be more technologically advanced than w900?
--
Posted: 2007-11-17 12:30:16
Edit :
Quote
simple:
software bug !!!
the K850 recorded video have actualy 30 frames per seconds. BUT after some seconds.. each two frame is recorded twice meaning in reality it shows only 15 frames per second.
but i saw some devices with the new firmware that doesn't have this problem.
W900 uses a hardware accelrator for video encoding so being 2 years senior than K850 is not much of a problem.
--
Posted: 2007-11-17 12:41:44
Edit :
Quote
Check out my videos on you tube... the one that is taken using W900 is stated on the TAG
The first 3 is taken using W900i while the others are taken using K750i
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=kumaressan[ This Message was edited by: kumarracing on 2007-11-18 08:39 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-18 09:37:37
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
