General discussions : Product reviews : If you want to compare T610 v 7250, here is a good review here.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Product reviews
> If you want to compare T610 v 7250, here is a good review here.
Bookmark topic
7250 has got 5,2mb
i know for sure
--
Posted: 2003-04-22 23:13:00
Edit :
Quote
yep he's right
greetzzz
--
Posted: 2003-04-24 17:27:00
Edit :
Quote
That review also says the 7250 doesn't have an email client onboard... This is something I use quite a bit on my T68i, and T610 also supports this.
--
Posted: 2003-05-26 10:20:42
Edit :
Quote
Ok, Let's get real here:
The SonyEricsson T610 has 2MB of internal memory. The Nokia 7250 has 3,5MB. (The 7650 which is considered a real smartphone has 3,6MB...) NOTE: mobile.burn.com said the phone rapported 5MB free memory, Nokia however does not.
The display on the T610 is 128x160, which equals to 20480 pixels with 65536 colors. The 7250 has 128 x 128 pixels = 16384 with 4096 colors. The math is simple, T610 has a FAR better display.
The T610 camera can take pictures up to 352x288. It features a night-shot function, can use an attaced flash, and has other digital effects like Sephia / Black&White amongst others. The 7250 can take pictures up to 352x288. No digital effects, no flash available. Better camera in Nokia? Not according to the numbers.
The T610 is 102 x 44 x 19 mm = 85cm³ and 95g. The 7250 is 105 x 44 x 19 mm = 88cm³ and 92g. T610 is smaller, but 3g heavier, but then again, the 7250 is made from plastic, not sweet aluminium..
The math is simple. The Nokia has a tad more memory but S U C K S everywhere else! The 7250 doesn't even have Bluetooth!
The T68 changed everything and sent the designers at other mobile manufacturers back to the drawing board for almost a year. Sony Ericsson leaps ahead once again and the others will have to work hard to keep up. Ericsson has been more technically advanced for several years. Screen resolution, they were first with graytones in displays (Nokia have never had a chance against the BW / graytone displays of Ericsson), functions, hell the R520 even used the IR-transmitter/reciever as a distance-measuring device(!!).
-Sources:
http://www.sonyericsson.com /
http://www.nokia.com / mobile.burn.com /
http://www.mobile-review.com.
Now stop nice around. The 7250 doesn't even compare to the T610.
(Nice is supposed to be "f-u-c-k-i-n-g")
-Alpha
[ This Message was edited by: thklinge on 2003-05-30 04:45 ]
--
Posted: 2003-05-30 05:39:26
Edit :
Quote
the review mainly compares the 7250 against the 7210 and there is a great improvement - clearly if the review directly compared the 7250 against the T610 the T610 would be the winner!
the 13 sec trick cleared enough space for me and my much loved t300
what i am thinking tho is that the t610 has a built in camera and i will take many more pictures
so i want 3MB+
what i really want is built in MP3 and a memory stick slot, would pay extra £100 for that
[ This Message was edited by: davio on 2003-05-30 14:27 ]
--
Posted: 2003-05-30 15:17:41
Edit :
Quote
you might be interested to view the photo for comparison
http://www.labuan.net/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=70&sid=9085b456e152fe90a3de086108dc96ea
--
Posted: 2003-06-02 20:23:28
Edit :
Quote
If you decide on the 7250 you might want to hang on for just a little while longer as apparently Nokia have the 7250i ready to role - it will supposedly support picture caller ID and have a better camera. I think Nokia's US website has the details.
--
Posted: 2003-06-03 00:48:53
Edit :
Quote
i agree. wait for the 7250i. as with regards to an email client, there are tons of java midlets email clients out there. as for memory, i like the compression of it's pictures. when you take a 15k picture, it only eats up 15k of memory (i heard differently on how a t610 stores pictures in which it says it eats up more memory). also, my graphics and polyphonic tones alone occupies about 1.5mb. a 2mb phone would not suffice. the point is, the 7250 has some edge in aspects like available memory for java apps and storage of more pics. what it lacks are the ability to exchange pics via irda, it has no bluetooth, etc...
--
Posted: 2003-06-14 08:56:26
Edit :
Quote
You guys forgot about the price differens between Nokia 7250 & SE T610 ?? BIGGGGGGG different .. in Sweden a Nokia 7250 coast about 6800:- (kronor) and SE coast about 4000:- (Kronor) !!
About 330 US$ SE T610 cheaper than Nokia 7250 !!!!! Come on guys.. and SE got more high tech than Nokia phones !!!
*Nokia 7250 have 4 096 colors only .. while SE have 65 500 ..
*Nokia 7250 have 4 channels Polophony ringtones while SE have 32
*Nokia 7250 have no built-in blue tooth while SE have it
*Nokia have wap 1.2 while SE have 2.0 since T68i phones
*Nokia got very bad Standby and talktime compare to SE T610 !! This point is very very clear.
*Nokia have very cheap plastic quality in thier 7250 while SE got aluminum chassi
*Nokia got LESS memory than SE, its very clear in thier site you can read about, besides that, SMS, MMS, CALENDER,RINGTONES, PICTURES, NOTICE PAD, etc share that memory !!
I agree when someone here said, to NOT compare Noki 7250 with SE T610 cause it´s simply big different.
Regarding the MEMORY, try to RESET ur phone RESET ALL, you will have more than 2 MB memory, you dont need more than that, cause THEMES take a big place, and even the ringtones, try with the reset and then fill your phone with what you want.
[ This Message was edited by: Night88 on 2003-07-07 13:49 ]
--
Posted: 2003-07-07 14:34:12
Edit :
Quote
check out this review of the t610:
http://mobile.burn.com/review.jsp?Id=391
--
Posted: 2003-07-09 11:47:31
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
