Esato Mobile
Manufacturer Discussion : Apple : Apple IPhone 5 Thread And Discussion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Manufacturer Discussion > Apple > Apple IPhone 5 Thread And Discussion Bookmark topic
Page <  123, 45 ... 505152>

Bonovox Posts: > 500

This makes me laugh vis the guy says they have completely redesigned the iPhone. Huh?? It looks the same but taller :-/

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=TLCvajE7sgM
--
Posted: 2012-09-13 21:53:00
Edit : Quote

Miss UK Posts: > 500

Some of those comments on that link are true but more or less
Sad!


Samsung really!? There not special either
There android phones are getting bigger and uglier
Every time I see them I used to like Samsung years ago
But I now think there rather cheesy like a cheesy poof



--
Posted: 2012-09-13 22:56:13
Edit : Quote

rikken Posts: > 500

http://www.youtube.com/watch?[....]q_q4&feature=player_embedded#!


[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2012-09-13 23:01 ]

--
Posted: 2012-09-13 23:24:39
Edit : Quote

Bonovox Posts: > 500

I seen that too very good Give me a Sony Xperia over this crap anyday
--
Posted: 2012-09-14 00:02:00
Edit : Quote

adnansanni Posts: > 500

rikken

Actually this year, Apple may have too much busy with the case with Samsung... so they didn't enough time to do much in/on new iPhone 5.

I had iPhone 4, which I used 1.5 year and sold recently. I have lots of paid app... so may be it will be wise decision to go for new iPod Touch rather than iPhone 5.
--
Posted: 2012-09-14 00:05:23
Edit : Quote

Miss UK Posts: > 500

I read it took apple 2-3 years to develop
Those new earPod headphones very slow
Pace in theory there also claiming those
Headphones sound like leading expensive
Headphones from other manufacturers hmm

I so gotta put then to test lol
Found out there £25 a pair lol
--
Posted: 2012-09-14 00:40:42
Edit : Quote

Vein Posts: > 500

I'll be getting one. Time to upgrade my 4.


--
Posted: 2012-09-14 01:07:35
Edit : Quote

Supa_Fly Posts: > 500

Those photos are not anything better nor worse than Sony,Samsung or Nokia. It's got a 4 inch screen,REVOLUTIONARY!! Not.

Quote from GSM Arena:
The camera features the same 8megapixel sensor as the on on the iPhone 4S, but the sensor is 25% smaller this time. There is a newly announced panorama mode, which obviously stitches together full res photos as the sample showcased had 28megapixel resolution.

28 meg res is that true??
Also why don't Apple ever mention,RAM,clock speed or how many cores??
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-09-12 22:11 ]


Stitch the pics together at 8MP each pic ... yes it can add up to 28megapixel - but the math is wrong (28/8 is not even - so some compression or touch up? hmm).

The reason why no mention of RAM or clock speed ...
because IT ... DOESN'T ... REALLY ... MATTER (Platinum Blonde)!
Seriously ... after all the braggin of the specs of a device or PC, are you going to get laid with those specs? Is it going to raise your IQ or your pocket book/bank account? Make you more attractive to the opposite sex?! Is it going to land you that dream job?! No!

Specs are ONLY important to developers, hardware accessory manufacturers and to the END user when requirement/want to upgrade software cannot be done due to processing/algorhythm compatibility! The technology is NOT to be front and centre ... its USE case IS supposed to be.

Examples if I may:

Mustang vs Corvette (the original did not have a V8 until 3/4yrs after BUT in original mint condition will ALWAYS fetch more on the market because when you drive it ... it just causes a feeling an experience different from anything else today or back in its prime). Same with Ferrari vs Lamboghini vs an Audi R8!

PowerPC processors in PowerMac G5's with 4 generation old OS and iMovie STILL crunch through video format conversions (if supported; RED video format is not) than even a 2yr old Mac Pro with 8 core Xeons!! If you focused on specs you'd buy the Mac Pro from 2yrs ago vs a late 2005 PowerMac G5. What you do NOT know is the type of processing is incredibly different along with the compilers to make the programs work. Shorter data processing pipelines ... did you realize that Apple has more experience with RISC cpu's than just about any other company in the mobile space (save for Nokia/Sony+Ericsson) from A9 onwards??
ARM9/ARM15 Cortex are both RISC based cpu's .... your fancy Intel/AMD chips are CISC based ... utterly completely different worlds; the huge CRAY super computers also ran on RISC cpu's originally (same with Sun Sparc, Solaris OS, Unix, etc etc).

When I date a woman ... I care about how she looks, how she behaves (around ppl/or not), etc etc ... I don't really care about her heritage/background. Yes I learn about her heritage as I'm not ignorant but I don't pick and choose a woman based on culture or heritage (white/hispanic/black/romanian/jewish/bulgarian/italian/chinese/korean/etc etc etc). Its the woman the person I'm dating not the heritage or the culture ... those makeup WHO she is but its not the end all of be all of WHO she REALLY is.

If you get those analogies ... then you understand what Apple is after with their entire product portfolio! They never could win at specs ... not with their pricing model and how much they spend to make their products look/feel unique. Its about the experience ... that rush and well also that "clique" (the "in" crowd thing).
hope that helps.
--
Posted: 2012-09-14 04:37:05
Edit : Quote

Supa_Fly Posts: > 500


On 2012-09-13 02:58:01, >500 wrote:
I wont be purchasing, and never will be... But, I did expect more from the iPhone 5. What exactly? I dont know, just more.
And I love when Apple claims the worlds this, the worlds that....



I think you hit it on the nose! WHAT to expect?
LTE, larger screens, thinness, its all been done before this iPhone so what is there to change or bring?!!

1. Keep the camera MP and 5 element glass (something that is innovation, nobody has done this and quality pics) even slimming device. Let's increase the lens strenght while we're at it since we're making it level with the rest of the device laying flat on any surface (Sapphire lens).
2. LTE ... we have to play here - BUT lets allow battery life to be useful and have people hunt around for a charging port every 4.5hrs like they did when hunting for a WiFi connection in the days of War-driving. I call this an inno-vation of thought = consideration!
3. The ability to work with ANY let alone 20 carriers to create a better VOICE codec & infrastructure to be implemented; something I expected of Nokia, Ericsson, Siemens, Motorola, Qualcomm, as they ALL built the infrastructure for the past 20-30yrs (give or take a few). THEY should be ashamed that a relatively new entrant had the balls to do this!
4. Charge connector calling it Lightning all sounds very frightening ... Galileo, Galileo, Galileo, Galileo ... Magnificooooo.
yeah gotta admit that was FRAK'IN STUPID!! Lameoooo. I want to smack somebody in Apple for the 2 hours of horrible Queen singing I heard in IT yesterday afternoon (EST zone); yes I work in IT.
5. Oh wait ... using a standard security API set so that business and applications can adhere to Innovation or evolution of innovation done by the likes of RIM; they still have a long way to go with security like RIM does but so does every other OS. Android still doesn't have a unified security API set - each manufacturer has to create their own EVEN in JB.

I really think a lot of people's hatred for Apple's PC products, marketing to sustain their pricing has come full circle to their smartphone/tablet products.

Etaab,

NFC Daily with your girlfriend. Although very beneficial to you daily, how is it REALLY more efficient than sending a pic via MMS/Email/Bluetooth?!
- you engage with NFC but it hands off to BT/WLAN right?
- MMS/Email you don't have to engage if one of you are off in a rush to work or to meet friends it can still be sent; what if you have to wait for her to get home before you go out?
(to me in that situation NFC = ball+chain).



--
Posted: 2012-09-14 05:20:15
Edit : Quote

Supa_Fly Posts: > 500


On 2012-09-13 12:45:00, Bonovox wrote:
They say looking at the camera images closely there is some luminance noise. Apple would get you into a ten year contract if they could



http://m.gsmarena.com/apple_releases_camera_sample_images_from_the_new_iphone_5-news-4796.php
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-09-13 11:50 ]



original iPhone negated contract pricing. Contract pricing is a model of the providers not the manufacturers ... and right now and for the foreseeable future, NO market can sustain carriers or their device retail prices beyond 1 year with no contract pricing. Collusion will begin with increased service pricing, we'll see more intentional drive-through raids (lol) in same nations/provinces if this where to occur.

Goldenface gets it. Since when has R&D paid back revenue each and every year?! Also Apple outsources most the hardware: cpu, lens, glass, manufacturing process, battery, etc etc why should they increase R&D costs?! Actually unless you're Samsung, LG, or Motorola you really should NOT increase R&D but actually lower it and outsource manufacturing. In a dog eat dog world Only these three make more than just smartphones and computers. They sell what else they make to the competition which also helps sustain revenues/profits and offset costs!


On 2012-09-13 21:38:06, goldenface wrote:
I watched that yesterday. Some people never cease to mayonnaise me.

Dude ... that is SooooOOOoooo wrong. I now have disgusting visions of jizz on you looking like Mayo. yuck lol.
--
Posted: 2012-09-14 05:35:22
Edit : Quote
Page <  123, 45 ... 505152>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home